Benny Marotta: A Scammer? (2024)


Benny Marotta, the well-known founder and CEO of Two Sisters Vineyards and Solmar Development Corp., is accused of far too many major offenses.


Argument Against His Two Enterprises

In opposition to his two businesses, Solmar (Niagara) 2 Inc. and Two Sisters Resort Corp. The accusations center on the devastation of the forest that Benny Marotta’s companies caused on the Rand Estate in 2018.

Refusing to Accept Charges:

A justice of the peace has just verbally stayed the complaints made against the two firms under the Heritage Act. Two Sisters and Solmar contend that the case infringes upon their Charter of Rights right to a prompt trial because so much time has passed since the initial charges were filed.

Town’s Response:

Without raising an objection, the Niagara-on-the-Lake municipality declines to accept the ruling. The municipality intends to contest the ruling, as stated by Chief Administrator Marnie Cluckie. Cluckie, however, also noted that the impending election might have an impact on the appeals process. She stressed the importance of setting deadlines and expressed concern that individuals would forfeit their opportunity to file an appeal if they waited until the next council met to make a decision.

Mayor’s Response:

Mayor Betty Disero expressed her displeasure with the court’s ruling by pointing out the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, which had an impact on legal proceedings. She was very clear that the decision’s timing was more significant than the content of the accusations.

Different Opinions:

Solmar Development Corp.’s general manager Giuseppe Paolicelli praised the court’s decision to drop the accusations. He asserted that the companies had not violated the Ontario Heritage Act and that the charges were baseless and motivated by politics. Paolicelli claimed the decision ended an expensive and needless trial.

A local group called Save Our Rand Estate (SORE) had a different stance. A full trial on the facts had not yet occurred, and the charges had not yet been looked at in detail, SORE spokesman Lyle Hall stressed.

Financial Repercussions:

The town and taxpayers were faced with questions regarding the fiscal ramifications of the court’s decision. Former councilor Martin Mazza was one of the people who voiced concerns about the town’s spending on lawsuits and legal fees. Mazza highlighted the potential financial consequences: should Solmar lose, the corporation will bear the expenses; should the municipality lose, taxpayers would have to bear the burden.

In its ongoing legal struggle over the allegations made against Two Sisters Resort Corp. and Solmar (Niagara) 2 Inc., the Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake has chosen to file an appeal. This case has prompted conversations in the community about the expenses and difficulties of litigation involving heritage-related problems.


The cash transaction instance

Developer Benny Marotta of Niagara-on-the-Lake was the subject of controversy in March when it was revealed that Gary Burroughs, a council member for Niagara-on-the-Lake, had purportedly received an envelope from Marotta during a meeting that included $10,000 in cash. The event caused a great deal of dread, so the police and the local authorities both looked into it further.

In response to the allegations, Benny Marotta has provided a statement explaining the cash transaction through his legal representation. According to Marotta, the funds were donated to a church and utilized for a campaign contribution. He says Burroughs got the money to settle any unpaid campaign debts relating to the election. Benny Marotta further clarifies that any surplus funds were meant to go to Burroughs’ church.

Regarding financial transactions, he stated that Burroughs had received a one-time contribution intended mainly to help with reelection campaign expenses.

Police inquiry and conclusion:

The town of Niagara-on-the-Lake took the event seriously and used its integrity commissioner to open an investigation. For their inquiry, the police were also notified of the incident. The Niagara Regional Police Service’s 2 District Criminal Investigations Branch, however, has concluded its investigation and determined there is insufficient evidence to bring charges under the Criminal Code, according to a later update. As a result, the police have chosen not to file any charges against Marotta.

Upcoming Evaluations and Action Items:

The police department decided not to press charges, thus the matter has now been referred to town officials and the integrity commissioner for further evaluation. This suggests that the local authorities will continue to look into the occurrence and its effects.

Marotta’s Desire for Achievement:

In his remarks, Benny Marotta expressed hope that councilman Gary Burroughs would also get a clean report from the integrity commissioner. Marotta highlighted his commitment to ensuring the continued prosperity and preservation of Niagara-on-the-Lake, along with his outlook for the neighborhood’s future.

Public Response:

The incident and the ensuing investigations have spurred conversations and reactions. It has raised questions about political campaign funding sources, morality, and the role of public officials in these matters.

The resolution in this case is not yet final because it is still pending further reviews. The story has shown how important it is to handle political and communal matters in a transparent manner while abiding by the law and moral principles.


Must be attentive before making any financial decisions.

First-time real estate investors must be well-prepared and make wise decisions if they hope to succeed. Some key guidelines include setting investment goals, learning, researching local markets, networking, obtaining financing, starting small, conducting thorough due diligence, estimating costs and earnings, managing risks, and obtaining professional advice. By following these guidelines, novices can confidently navigate the real estate market and increase their chances of long-term success.

Benny Marotta discusses investment planning on his blog page, which can be accessed using the link below.


The conflict around urban sprawl

Benny Marotta has begun construction on a massive project that will cover an area of about 740 hectares of farmland southwest of Bolton. His vision for this area aims to significantly change the mostly rural municipality of Caledon by housing 21,000 people and creating 11,000 jobs.

Marotta’s investment and the difficulties:

Marotta has made a substantial financial investment of more than $50 million in a 60-hectare industrial park located in Bolton. However, not many people have visited the park thus far. Because the land he intends to develop is currently only allowed for agricultural use, Marotta has also set aside a sizable amount of money for study and the purchase of property.

In the realm of high-stakes development, the results are usually divided into two categories: successful and unsuccessful. However, Benny Marotta is situated at the other end of this range. Marotta is eager to go to work building, but Caledon’s council has told him to wait. He consequently feels overwhelmed by frustration, a sensation that others in similar circumstances may also feel.

Disagreement in the Developmental Domain:

Marotta’s determination to pursue his development goals in tandem with the constraints imposed by Caledon’s council is in opposition to each other. One of these restrictions is a 13-year development moratorium in the neighboring rural areas. The municipality prioritizes expansion through redevelopment and infilling inside current urban limits, which has put Marotta and the council at conflict.

Urban Expansion versus Saturation:

Larger conversations around urbanization and sprawl are reflected in the battle. The city of Caledon backs government initiatives aimed at limiting urban sprawl and focusing growth inside pre-existing metropolitan areas. Critics point out that it would hinder business and economic advancement, however this is debatable.


There were demonstrations, legal disputes, and discussions within the community about what to do next as things in Caledon grew worse. Tensions have gotten so bad that incidents involving threats and bodily harm have raised concerns about people’s safety.

Caledon’s Challenges to Reaching Growth Objectives:

The province’s regulations, like the Places to Grow Act, greatly influence Caledon’s decision-making procedure. This Act sets down demographic targets and requires that forty percent of future growth take place in already established regions. It is difficult to distribute growth within these limitations in a way that takes into consideration the interests of many developers.

Viewpoint & Feedback from Benny Marotta:

Benny Marotta has expressed his dissatisfaction with the Caledon council, accusing them of impeding progress and investment and criticizing their approach to regulating growth. He conveys concerns about the potential negative impact of expansion restrictions on his Bolton business park.

Conflict on the freeze on municipal borders:

The Caledon council made a crucial decision to freeze urban limits, which was particularly detrimental to the rapidly developing Bolton sector. People and businesses disagree with this decision, arguing that it will inhibit investment and cause stagnation.

Critics and Supporters of Intensification:

There is debate over whether to prioritize intensification or greenfield development, with some advocating for higher population densities and redevelopment as growth strategies. However, many people—including many residents of Bolton—oppose this change and stress how important it is to expand it over agricultural area.

The Complicated Predicament in Caledon:

Caledon’s complex problems stem from a number of decisions and actions made over the years that combined competing developer interests, local aspirations, and regional development aims. The greater Peel Region, including Caledon, might be impacted by the war.

Prospective Concerns:

The ongoing growth issue remains unresolved about the distribution of population objectives among Caledon and other Peel Region municipalities. Marotta’s objectives might be challenging given the community’s changing dynamics and differing opinions.

About Benny Marotta:

Concerns and grievances have accompanied Benny Marotta’s involvement in the winemaking and real estate industries. He is the creator and CEO of Solmar Development Corp., a company that has faced criticism for its approaches to real estate development. Benny’s collaboration with his daughters, Angela and Melissa, in managing Two Sisters Vineyards has also been tarnished by unfavorable press.

Benny Marotta began his career as a laborer for a bricklayer and worked his way up to become a well-known figure in Canada’s real estate and construction industries. He started a bricklaying company in the early 1980s, and it eventually hired numerous teams. Benny Marotta began building custom homes in the late 1980s and established Solmar House Inc. to build single-family homes in the Greater Toronto Area. During its peak, Solmar, his company, was constructing over 800 homes annually in several large cities.

In 1996, Benny Marotta began his first real estate venture, purchasing land in Richmond Hill and subdividing it into 120 lots. Furthermore, he collaborated with the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community to construct 300 homes on land built next to a mosque. By acquiring industrial sites in Vaughan, building industrial structures, and developing an industrial park in Bolton, he expanded the extent of his holdings. He also built three industrial structures in Oakville.

During the early 2000s home market boom, Benny Marotta took advantage of the situation by selling builders more than 2,500 single-family dwelling lots. But when the market took a turn for the worst, Marotta and Solmar moved their focus back to home construction. Apart from constructing high-rise buildings, stacked townhouse condominiums, and single-family homes, Solmar Development Corp. is also involved in land development.

In 2006, Marotta ventured into the wine industry by transforming abandoned peach orchards into Niagara-on-the-Lake’s Two Sisters Vineyards. Following its 2018 Winery of the Year victory, the winery expanded its vines to over 160 acres across four locations.

Benny Marotta has endured controversies and legal battles over the years, despite his triumphs. These have included claims pertaining to property development and a case concerning a cash transaction. Sadly, these negative attributes have often overshadowed his philanthropic activities, which include contributions to hospices, hospitals, schools, and organizations that support the needs of children.

The Bottom Line

As I look over Benny Marotta’s development designs, a lot of intricate issues and conflicts come up. These episodes thus serve as examples of the challenges and conflicts that arise in the sphere of development, where the objectives of developers, towns, and communities frequently conflict. These are still unresolved issues that could have a big impact on the communities affected and adjacent locations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post
David Kushner Cresskill NJ

David Kushner Cresskill NJ: A Criminal? (2024)

Next Post

Brandon Steven Wichita: A Criminal? (2024)

Related Posts

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

[yikes-mailchimp form="1"]