Chris Davis had been a neighbor for at least 8 years. I walked past his house at least 6x a day, alone just walking my dog every day. I thought he would be ethical since we had common neighborhood friends & his children attend school with children of my friends. I have attempted to request that he resolve problems that surfaced after my settlment & he has behaved in an unbelievable unprofessional manor. I’m absolutly shocked, recieved a threating email from him claiming that there was some Restaining Order Placed on me & that the local Police were involved. I have never done anything that would worrent that kind of action, in fact I have been way to busy to deal with it.He later sent a series of emails saying that I need psycological help & to stop harrasing him. He sent 3 emails in one day. He also had my email blocked & this is his customer service tactic. At the time of settlement, he said, “if anything arises concerning my case, just let him know & he would handle it.” When he said that my gut was he was a fox guarding the chicken coop & that I would need to handle things myself. Sure enough the State of California had questions of their own, indicating that my gut was right on target. His words are those of a emotional abuser & a sad sick attempt to avoid cleaning up the mass he created. If anything, he enjoyed the fact that I was so busy, that I neglected addressing the issue but now with this display of behavior I will not let this go. My gut told me that he was assiting the defendants more so than he was concerned about my best interst and it wasn’t till after my settlement that the State of California questioned his settlement arangement. I ran into him unexpectedly after the State contacted me & his body language spoke volumes. It was that of someone who got caught when he thought he could get away with the arrangement he advise. You can review more details on the site chrisdavislaborattorneycomplaint.weebly.com/ dedicated to my issue with him which is being prepared in order to file a second complaint against him with the State Bar, Better Business Bureau & California State Realtor division. It will be updated as I pursue my complaint against him. Chris Davis is also a Realtor along with his wife Anette Davis.
After getting scammed out of $329.00 from guns-warehouse.com, a simple search of some of the verbiage in the website popped up 4 other
John Sutton is loser trash, complete scum of the earth low life idiot turd monger asshole bastard Wife Beater Threw hot water on a poor woman Bloomsburg PA
WARNING JOHN SUTTON IS A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PURPITRATOR HE BEAT A WOMAN THEN TREW HOT WATER ON HER. HE WAS CHARGE WITH FELONY ASSAULT.
Dirty Cop Raymond Ketchmark falsified police reports. Ketchmark routinely receives grafts to make creative reports with false narrative to
They will double or triple charge you by failing transactions and then charging your account. They have no proper online or official
My family has been being harassed by a middle aged man named who goes by the name John but I have been advised by the authorities that his
We drove over a hour and bought a SUV she and the man from the service center cleared the codes found the real koh guy who we bought
BIG SCAM. DO NOT BUY. ORDERED TURQUOISE INDIAN NAVAJO RING AND GOT A RING MADE OF TIN. Previous Review Next Review
My husband and I our purchased in the fall of 2019. They enticed us saying that we could get a free vacation to Hawaii and free airfare
This complaint and/or review was posted on Defaulters.com on 13:08 pm, January 20, 2021 (CST) and is a permanent record located at: https://www.defaulters.com/scam/christopher-sherwood-davis/.
The reviews & complaints posted about Christopher Sherwood Davis was submitted by a member or guest on this website. Any and all opinions and information are published as is. Defaulters.com does not edit or remove any aspect of the report and is simply a consumer grievance free-speech platform. As such, Defaulters.com cannot be held liable for the complaints and reviews posted about Christopher Sherwood Davis as per Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.