This is all MY OPINION and you can make your own opinion after reading this. I would also urge you to read other online reviews and I have found reviews indicating Kring & Chung threatens clients who write negative reviews on online review sites such as yelp and AVVO. | After using a Kring & Chung Lawyer (under supervision of Kenneth Chung) who wasn’t able to communicate a strategy for my case, billed more than twice the communicated budget amount, billing error after billing error and made decisions which ultimately ended up losing the case, I decided to read their online reviews. I have since found the below online, which will be of great interest to current and former clients. It appears there are some quesitonable billing practices and you may want to work with the CA Bar to see if you are owed a refund. | I will be starting my bar complaint and my fee arbitration request to recover fees asap. | __________________ | FACTUAL, documented excerpts from OC Bar Association Fee Arbitration with Kring & Chung relating to the fees they charge clients, publicly available on the OC Superior Court online case records when Kring & Chung sued a client after a fee dispute. | Research Fees: | Attorneys are not entitled to recover $X,XXX.XX, billed to Client for legal research. Attorneys admitted that it did not bill Client (or other clients) for all legal research done on Westlaw because they had an agreement with Westlaw that provided for unlimited access to certain parts of Westlaw for a monthly fee. It is not reasonable based on the language of the Fee Agreement nor is it reasonable based on the Client’s expectation to bill the Client for this expense. | Copy Fees: | Attorneys are not entitled to recover for the $XXX.XX in photocopies on (insert date). Attorneys did not offer any evidence, testimony or argument as to why such copies were necessary. | Billing Errors: | Given the numerous errors in the Billings and the legitimate disputes raised by Client (including improper hourly rates, improper fees incurred after (insert date), improper legal research expenses and photocopies), Attorneys are not entitled to pre-award interest on the amounts owing.
After getting scammed out of $329.00 from guns-warehouse.com, a simple search of some of the verbiage in the website popped up 4 other
John Sutton is loser trash, complete scum of the earth low life idiot turd monger asshole bastard Wife Beater Threw hot water on a poor woman Bloomsburg PA
WARNING JOHN SUTTON IS A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PURPITRATOR HE BEAT A WOMAN THEN TREW HOT WATER ON HER. HE WAS CHARGE WITH FELONY ASSAULT.
Dirty Cop Raymond Ketchmark falsified police reports. Ketchmark routinely receives grafts to make creative reports with false narrative to
They will double or triple charge you by failing transactions and then charging your account. They have no proper online or official
My family has been being harassed by a middle aged man named who goes by the name John but I have been advised by the authorities that his
We drove over a hour and bought a SUV she and the man from the service center cleared the codes found the real koh guy who we bought
BIG SCAM. DO NOT BUY. ORDERED TURQUOISE INDIAN NAVAJO RING AND GOT A RING MADE OF TIN. Previous Review Next Review
My husband and I our purchased in the fall of 2019. They enticed us saying that we could get a free vacation to Hawaii and free airfare
This complaint and/or review was posted on Defaulters.com on 10:24 am, January 11, 2021 (CST) and is a permanent record located at: https://www.defaulters.com/scam/kring-chung-attorneys-llp/.
The reviews & complaints posted about Kring & Chung Attorneys LLP was submitted by a member or guest on this website. Any and all opinions and information are published as is. Defaulters.com does not edit or remove any aspect of the report and is simply a consumer grievance free-speech platform. As such, Defaulters.com cannot be held liable for the complaints and reviews posted about Kring & Chung Attorneys LLP as per Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.