Real Prompt

Real Prompt Review

Reviews: 1

1 RATING
(1)

Total views: 4269

Published: 18 June 2019

Posted by: Anonymously

Real Prompt stated they would send me qualified leads in March of 2014, and they emailed me and charged my credit card $97 in March and then 197 Two weeks later. I got nothing for the nearly three hundred dollars, and I cancelled the whole subscription, and they stated I removed them from my email list. I told them I did not, and they stated I did, so I told them to cancel it and give me my money back. They stated I had to email them, which I did, and I still am out three hundred. This is July.

Rate and Write a Review on Real Prompt

Sending

Sam Shapiro aka Samuel Shapiro infringing privacy

Sam Shapiro, sometimes known as Samuel Shapiro, is an operations assistant who may continue to infringe individuals’ privacy by searching

ILYLaw.com – Arizona’s Worst Lawyer

ilylaw.com About Izzy Yetnikoff Izzy Yetnikoff of ILYLAW.COM is an awful lawyer and a horrid human being and has made A TON of enemies and

Has paranoia issues affecting her corruption

Kelyali Infante-cruz, or Kelyali Infante, is a neurotic actress who believes she is being observed at home or at work. THIS WAS NOT A GOOD

Scam

This is not a job.  It is a MLM pyramid schemes.  They just want to get a hold of your family and friends insurance policy for ”.  “

nina chabria has issues at work

nina chabria was advertising on Craigslist. A sincere and normal post. When sending emails, nina chabria uses scripts. She was once

Corrupt human resources manager

Catherine Collado, or Catherine Logrono, is a dishonest Human Resources Manager at ABM Industries who is orchestrating layoffs by changing

Ponzi Lawyer

Ponzi Lawyer Padowitz makes dirty deals behind your back. Kenny Padowitz laundered cash for Scott Rothstein. His accomplice and campaign

Defaulting on invoices / abuse of suppliers – a warning to the industry

We are a consortium of suppliers to David Neikrug and Optimatum Solutions. We are preparing a class action law suit against Mr Neikrug and